iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) vs Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc): how much do they overlap?
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FXC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc) (VHVG) have a 0% holdings overlap. 0.6% of FXC's holdings by weight are also held by VHVG, and 0% the other way. They share 1 securities. Computed from the funds' published holdings.
iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) vs Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc): what’s the difference?
Side by side, from issuer data
Both FXC and VHVG are broad, low-cost index ETFs, so they hold many of the same companies — their holdings overlap 0% by weight. The table below puts their key facts side by side: issuer, ongoing cost (TER), domicile, replication method, and whether they reinvest dividends (accumulating) or pay them out (distributing).
| Metric | FXC | VHVG |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| TER (ongoing cost) | 0.74% | 0.12% |
| Domicile | IE | IE |
| Replication | physical | physical |
| Dividends | Distributing | Accumulating |
Top shared holdings
Securities held by both, by overlapping weight
| Holding | FXC | VHVG |
|---|---|---|
| Sysmex Corp | 0.59% | 0.00% |
Frequently asked questions
- How much do FXC and VHVG overlap?
- iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FXC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc) (VHVG) have a 0% holdings overlap. 0.6% of FXC's holdings by weight are also held by VHVG, and 0% the other way. They share 1 securities. Computed from the funds' published holdings.
- Is FXC the same as VHVG?
- No — iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FXC) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (Acc) (VHVG) are separate funds, but their holdings overlap 0% by weight, and 0.6% of FXC also sits inside VHVG. They are similar, not identical.
- Which is cheaper, FXC or VHVG?
- FXC has an ongoing charge (TER) of 0.74% per year and VHVG 0.12%. VHVG is the cheaper of the two at 0.12% per year.
- Should you hold both FXC and VHVG?
- Holding both means owning the shared 0% twice. The higher the overlap, the less diversification a second fund adds — at 0% these two are largely the same bet, so most investors pick one as their core rather than holding both.
Compare any two ETFs
Pick a different pair and see the full shared-holdings breakdown.
Overlap = the sum, across securities held by both funds, of the smaller of the two weights (the standard ETF-overlap definition). Figures derive from each issuer's published holdings. Methodology.